Volume 4,Issue 2
A Dialogue Between Julius Caesar and Mencius on the Justice of War
This article examines Brutus’s assassination of Caesar in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar through the framework of Mencius’ theory of just war. Using the Mencian criteria of motive, means, and consequence, it offers a cross-cultural reassessment of the legitimacy of tyrannicide in the play. The study argues that Caesar does not meet Mencius’ standard of a tyrant, while the violent consequences of the assassination and the reversal of public opinion undermine Brutus’s claim to justice. From the perspective of Mencian ethics, the assassination lacks a foundation in benevolence and therefore cannot be regarded as a just political act.
[1] Zhang Y, 2014, Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and Republicanism. Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 51(03): 44-56.
[2] Shakespeare W, 1974, The Riverside Shakespeare. Houghton Mifflin Company.
[3] Wu ZG, 2024, The Mental Foundation of the Peaceful Nature of Chinese Civilization: A Perspective from Pre-Qin Confucian and Daoist Theories of Mind, with a Discussion of Just War. History of Chinese Philosophy, (06): 5-12.
[4] Mencius, 1970, Mencius. Penguin Books.
[5] Zou XJ, 2024, Shakespeare Studies: Ideas and Methodologies of Yang Zhouhan. Central Plains Literature, (13): 64-66.
[6] Proudfoot R, Thompson A, Kastan DS, et al., 2011, The Arden Shakespeare: The Complete Works (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare.
[7] Peng L, 2017, Caesar’s Crime and Punishment? Reading Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. Comparative Literature in China, (01): 29-38.
[8] Yu YP, Li WF, 2021, Julius Caesar: An Implicit Writing of the Conflict between Poetry and Philosophy. Journal of Henan University (Social Sciences Edition), 61(02): 80-89.
[9] Bai TD, 2013, Benevolent Authority above Sovereignty: Mencius’ Theory of Just War. Social Sciences, (01): 131-139.
[10] Feng W, 2011, Roman Democracy: Roman Politics in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. Foreign Literature Review, (03): 5-15.