Volume 3,Issue 9
Reconsidering the Aesthetic Attributes and Value of AI-Generated Art from the Perspective of “Qu”
Drawing on the concept of “Qu” from traditional Chinese aesthetics, this paper examines the aesthetic generative mechanisms and value attribution of AI-generated art. Grounded in Qu’s key characteristics—non-instrumentality, balanced mediation, the principle of “deviating from convention while remaining in accord with aesthetic order,” and embodied experience—this study proposes an alternative framework for understanding AI art. By doing so, it seeks to articulate a middle path that reconciles human subjectivity with technological generativity, thereby fostering a model of human–technology co-existence within a posthuman context.
[1] Messingschlager VT, Appel M, 2025, Mind Ascribed to AI and the Appreciation of AI-generated Art. New Media & Society, 27(3): 1673–1692.
[2] Zhang HL, 2005, Chinese Aesthetics of Qu (Interest and Aesthetic Pleasure). Jiangsu Education Press, Nanjing.
[3] Jin CC, 2024, The Impact of Mechanical Reproduction on Popular Conceptions of Art. Popular Literature and Art, (11): 31–33.
[4] Shapiro M, Meyer S, 2016, Theory and Philosophy of Art: Style, Artist, and Society. Jiangsu Phoenix Fine Arts Publishing House, Jiangsu.
[5] Wang F, 2023, Does Artificial Intelligence Need a ‘Soul’? Possibilities and Critical Reflections Triggered by Large Language Models. Journal of Shanghai Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 52(02): 5–13.
[6] Aaron L, Gavin D, Franchini B, et al., 2024, Using AI in Creative Works. Optimizing AI in Higher Education: SUNY FACT2 Guide, Second Edition, Pressbooks, California.
[7] Benjamin W, 1990, The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. World Cinema, Frankfurt.
[8] Klyve D, 2022, AFTERMATH: Exploring the Art of AI. Math Horizons, 30(1): 34.
[9] Bara I, Darda MK, Ramsey R, et al., 2025, Algorithmic Aesthetics: Cognitive Perspectives on AI-generated Visual Art. iScience, 28(11): 113826.