ARTICLE

Volume 3,Issue 5

Cite this article
4
Citations
18
Views
26 June 2025

Enhancing Chinese Student Participation in TESOL Classrooms through Culturally Responsive Teaching

Zhenzhao Ma1
Show Less
1 Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, China
EIR 2025 , 3(5), 135–138; https://doi.org/10.18063/EIR.v3i5.603
© 2025 by the Author. Licensee Whioce Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Chinese students in TESOL classrooms often demonstrate low verbal participation, which is frequently misunderstood as a lack of language proficiency. However, this silence is deeply rooted in cultural norms that emphasize humility and respect for authority. This paper explores how Culturally Responsive Teaching (CRT) integrates students’ cultural identities into instructional practices to address this issue. By examining cultural factors such as Confucianism, reviewing the theoretical underpinnings and practical applications of CRT, and proposing targeted strategies like culturally relevant materials, modified group interactions, and inclusive teaching techniques, this study argues that Chinese students’ participation can be enhanced without compromising their cultural identity.

Keywords
TESOL classrooms
Cultural Factors
Culturally Responsive Teaching
References

[1] Gay G, 2000, Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press: 21-44.

[2] Hammond Z, 2014, Culturally responsive teaching and the brain: Promoting authentic engagement and rigor among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press: 44-46.

[3] Wang M, 2019, Analysis of classroom silence in English class in Chinese universities. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2(1): 54-64.

[4] Liu J, 2002, Negotiating silence in American classrooms: Three Chinese cases. Language and Intercultural Communication, 2(1): 37-54.

[5] Yu H, 2016, Why are they silent?. Society, 53(6): 625-631.

[6] Santamaria L J, 2009, Culturally responsive differentiated instruction: Narrowing gaps between best pedagogical practices benefiting all learners. Teachers College Record, 111(1): 214-247.

[7] Idrus F, Sohid M, 2023, Teachers’ expectations and challenges in using culturally responsive teaching (CRT) strategies in the ESL classroom. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 14(3): 467-475.

[8] Ladson-Billings G, 2022, The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. Hoboken: John wiley & sons: 13-14.

[9] Vinogradova P, Kang S J, 2020, Contemporary foundations for teaching English as an additional language. London: Routledge: 89-113.

[10] Gay G, 2018, Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. 2nd ed. New York: Teachers College Press: 202-249.

Share
Back to top