Volume ,Issue
Research on the Multiple Governance Paths of Civil Legal Disputes in Private Lending from the Perspective of Public Management
Civil legal disputes in private lending constitute a public issue that combines financial risks with social governance attributes. The traditional single judicial adjudication model proves inadequate for both efficient dispute resolution and source control of legal conflicts. Integrating public management theories—such as holistic governance, collaborative governance, and risk governance—into the governance of private lending disputes is crucial for achieving efficient resolution, source control, and enhanced governance effectiveness. From a public management perspective, this article first outlines the governance logic of private lending disputes, then explores diversified governance approaches, aiming to provide references for safeguarding financial security and promoting social harmony and stability.
[1] Wang P, 2025, Issues and Solutions in Civil Legal Disputes over Private Lending. Legal System Review, 2025(26): 64–66.
[2] Tian H, 2024, Legal Regulation of Private Lending Disputes in China. Rule of Law and Society, 2024(6): 53–55.
[3] Zhang HL, 2023, Allocation of Burden of Proof in Private Lending Disputes. Legal System Review, 2023(35): 133–135.
[4] Song XY, 2022, Legal and Economic Analysis of the Current Status and Causes of Private Lending Disputes: A Case Study of the Loan Contract Dispute Between Tian Mou, Zhou Mou and Zhongyuan Trust Co., Ltd. Hebei Enterprise, 2022(6): 138–142.
[5] Gao KQ, 2021, Legal Key Points in Private Lending Dispute Cases. Legal System Review, 2021(29): 151–152.