Volume 3,Issue 7
Research on the Judicial Reform Path of Detention Measures
With the deepening of China's supervisory system reform, detention measures—serving as the core investigative tool for investigating official misconduct and crimes—have revealed procedural issues in practice, including insufficient transparency in approval processes, ambiguous time limit regulations, and inadequate protection of investigated individuals' rights. Addressing these challenges arising from the implementation of the Supervision Law, this study employs theories of power checks and procedural justice, combined with comparative legal perspectives on judicial review mechanisms. It explores pathways for judicial reform of detention measures through legislative improvements, establishment of judicial review frameworks, and strengthened rights protections. The aim is to ensure that supervisory authority operates within legal boundaries while achieving a balance between anti-corruption effectiveness and human rights safeguards.
[1] Guo H, 2025, Interpretation of the Normative System of Power Restraint and Rights Protection in the Supervision Law— Based on the Revised Supervision Law. Journal of Financial and Legal Studies, 2025(03): 64-70.
[2] Huang X R, Legal and Accurate Application of the Retention Time Extension and Recalculation System. China Discipline Inspection and Supervision, (01): 50-51.
[3] Xia W, 2024, Establishment of Interrogation System in Supervision Retention Facilities. Journal of Sichuan Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), (06): 97-105.
[4] Wei J G, Wei Y N, 2024, On the Connection between Retention and Criminal Coercive Measures in the Supervision Law—— Using Retention Cases from C City Procuratorate (2019-2022) as a Sample. Journal of Southwest Minzu University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), (10): 80-88.
[5] Xiang Y H, 2024, Research on the Connection between Supervision Retention and Criminal Coercive Measures. Haikou: Hainan University, 27.
[6] Wang B J, 2024, Analysis of Supervision Advantages, Existing Issues, and Improvement Strategies in Retention Measures. Journal of Hebei Science and Technology Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), (02): 68-72.
[7] He Y, 2024, Practical Landscape and Institutional Improvement of Retention Measures Connection with Criminal Coercive Measures. Changchun: Jilin University, 23.
[8] Li L F, 2024, Legalization Research on Supervision Retention Measures from the Perspective of Due Process. Zhengzhou; Henan University of Economics and Law, 16.
[9] Zhang L, 2023, Systematic Construction of Supervision Detention Measures under Digital Rule of Law. Journal of Liaoning University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), (05): 68-77.
[10] Chao C S, Ding S, 2023, Legal Attributes and Application Research of Supervision Detention Measures under Anti-Corruption Rule of Law. Journal of Changchun Normal University, (07): 43-47.
[11] Liu M, 2023, Research on Defense Rights Protection for Investigation Targets During Detention Periods. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 14.
[12] Li Z G, 2023, Research on the Connection between Supervision Detention Measures and Criminal Compulsory Measures. Wuhan: Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 21.
[13] Zi Z F, 2023, Legal Reflections and Procedural Regulation on the Connection between Supervision Detention and Custodial Measures. Politics and Law, (03): 34-49.
[14] Yang Y N, Song P P, 2022, Preliminary Exploration of Legal Attributes of Supervision Detention Measures. Journal of Lanzhou University of Arts and Science (Social Sciences Edition), (06): 96-101.
[15] Meng C C, Zhu Z S, 2022, Deficiencies and Improvements in the Connection between Supervision Detention and Criminal Compulsory Measures. Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University, (05): 41-46.