ARTICLE

Volume 3,Issue 9

Cite this article
1
Download
1
Citations
23
Views
26 November 2025

Re-mediating Heritage: ICH Documentaries as Generative Memory Devices

Peng Liu1 Juan Luo2
Show Less
1 Guangzhou College of Applied Science and Technology, Guangzhou 511370, Guangdong, China
2 China West Normal University, Nanchong 637001, Sichuan, China
LNE 2025 , 3(10), 183–188; https://doi.org/10.18063/LNE.v3i10.1121
© 2025 by the Author. Licensee Whioce Publishing, Singapore. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

In the digital context, Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) documentaries have evolved from salvage recording tools into” re-mediation devices” reorganizing tradition and modernity. This paper elucidates how they actively construct contemporary cultural memory. In narrative generation, strategies like reconstructing” sacred time” and symbol activation encode practices into accessible” memory time.” In space production, images establish presence through” location-soundscape” and” body-stage” performance, constructing symbolic” sites of memory”. Ultimately, these mechanisms transform ICH from local experiences into open public memory, functioning as digital devices that rebuild cultural continuity at the fracture points of modernity.

Keywords
ICH Documentaries
Cultural Memory
Re-mediation
References

[1] Lenzerini F, 2011, Intangible Cultural Heritage: The Living Culture of Peoples. European Journal of International Law, 22(1): 101–120.

[2] Bartolo L, 2024, Algorithmic Recommendation as Repair Work: Towards a More Just Distribution of Attention on Cultural and Entertainment Digital Platforms, thesis, Queensland University of Technology.

[3] Erlewein SN, 2015, Intangible Matters: Methodologies in Visual Anthropology and the Documentation of Intangible Cultural Heritage. Documenting and Presenting Intangible Cultural Heritage on Film, 25: 1–25.

[4] Becker C, 2013, Aby Warburg’s Pathosformel as Methodological Paradigm. Journal of Art Historiography, 9: CB1.

[5] The Collective Memory Reader, 2011, The Collective Memory Reader. Oxford University Press, London.

[6] Legg S, 2005, Contesting and Surviving Memory: Space, Nation, and Nostalgia in Les Lieux de Mémoire. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23(4): 481–504.

[7] Assmann J, 2011, Communicative and Cultural Memory. Cultural Memories: The Geographical Point of View, 2011: 15–27.

[8] Connerton P, 1989, How Societies Remember. Cambridge University Press, New York.

[9] Landsberg A, 2004, Prosthetic Memory: The Transformation of American Remembrance in the Age of Mass Culture. Columbia University Press, Columbia.

[10] Yuan MQ, 2020, Telling Family Stories: Media Memory Practice, Definitional Ceremony, and Communication Empowerment. Social Sciences in Nanjing, (9): 112–119.

[11] Nora P, 1989, Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations, 26: 7–24.

[12] Mediation, Remediation, and the Dynamics of Cultural Memory, 2009, Mediation, Remediation, and the Dynamics of Cultural Memory. Walter de Gruyter, German.

[13] Wardrip-Fruin MN, Montfort N, 2003, The New Media Reader. MIT Press, New York.

[14] Bolter JD, Grusin R, 2000, Remediation: Understanding New Media. The MIT Press, New York.

[15] Stiegler B, 2010, Technics and Time, 3: Cinematic Time and the Question of Malaise. Stanford University Press, New York.

[16] Connerton P, 1989, How Societies Remember. Cambridge University Press, New York.

[17] Bauman R, 1975, Verbal Art as Performance 1. American Anthropologist, 77(2): 290–311.

Share
Back to top