Volume 3,Issue 9
Human–Machine Boundaries, Ethics, and Identity in Japanese Mecha and Anglophone Cyborg Narratives
This article develops a comparative framework for Japanese mecha narratives and Anglophone cyborg narratives by operationalizing the human–machine boundary as a narrative architecture that organizes agency, risk, and responsibility. Rather than explaining ethical differences through pre-given cultural values, it examines how boundary logics generate ethical problem-spaces and thereby shape identity as a criterion of narrative viability. Two recurring configurations structure the comparison. In many Japanese mecha texts, the boundary is staged as an interface—through piloting, synchronization, and embodied control loops—so that conflict arises within conditions of already-established coupling; ethical stakes tend to center on negotiated interdependence and distributed accountability. In many Anglophone cyborg narratives, the boundary is coded as a threshold that secures personhood through separation; mediation is acceptable only insofar as it remains reversible and consented to, and narrative tension peaks when the boundary is breached via coercion or irreversible inscription. By tracing boundary-conditioned ethics and identity across representative texts from the postwar period to the present, the article offers a mechanism-based account of cross-cultural variation without resorting to simplified cultural binaries.
[1] Bolton C, Csicsery-Ronay I Jr, Tatsumi T, 2007, Robot Ghosts and Wired Dreams: Japanese Science Fiction from Origins to Anime, thesis, University of Minnesota Press.
[2] Napier S, 2001, Anime from Akira to Princess Mononoke: Experiencing Contemporary Japanese Animation. Palgrave, London.
[3] Tatsumi T, 2006, Full Metal Apache: Transactions Between Cyberpunk Japan and Avant-Pop America. Duke University Press, Durham.
[4] Anno H, 1995, Neon Genesis Evangelion. Gainax, Japan.
[5] Xing R, 2022, Personality Rebirth and Reconstruction in Neon Genesis Evangelion from a Psychoanalytic Perspective. Aesthetics, (02): 126–128.
[6] Silvio T, 1999, Refiguring the Radical Cyborg in Mamoru Oshii’s Ghost in the Shell. Science Fiction Studies, 26(1): 54–72.
[7] Hayles N, 1999, How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[8] Scott R, 1982, Blade Runner. Warner Bros, Los Angeles.
[9] Bertek T, 2015, The Authenticity of the Replica: A Post-Human Reading of Blade Runner. Sic: časopis za književnost, kulturu i književno prevođenje, 5(1): 1–17.
[10] Orbaugh S, 2002, Sex and the Single Cyborg: Japanese Popular Culture Experiments in Subjectivity. Science Fiction Studies, 29(3): 436–452.
[11] Napier S, 2002, When the Machines Stop: Fantasy, Reality, and Terminal Identity in Neon Genesis Evangelion and Serial Experiments Lain. Science Fiction Studies, 29(3): 418–435.
[12] Yokoyama M, 1956–1966, Tetsujin 28-gō. Kobunsha, 1956–1966.
[13] Oshii M, 1995, Ghost in the Shell. Production I.G, Japan.
[14 Gunkel D J, 2008, Beyond the Matrix: The Cybernetic Theory of Autonomy. Journal of Media Philosophy, 1(1): 1–18.
[15] Frey M, 2023, Societal Structures from Anime-Cyberpunk to Postcyberpunk: City Imagery in Ghost in the Shell and Psycho-Pass. The Journal of Anime and Manga Studies, 4: 131–158.
[16] Tomino Y, 1979, Mobile Suit Gundam. Sunrise, Japan.
[17] Takahashi R, 1983, Armored Trooper Votoms. Sunrise, Japan.
[18] Zhu M, 2025, Ghost in the Shell: Body Mirroring, Subjective Dilemma and “Nomadic Subjectivity”. Contemporary Animation, (3): 33–36.
[19] Otomo K, 1988, Akira. Toho, Tokyo.
[20] Lei C, 2025, The Existential Dilemmas of Cyborgs in the Films Blade Runner and Ghost in the Shell. Popular Literature and Art, (22): 60–63.
[21] Columbus C, 1999, Bicentennial Man. Touchstone Pictures, Los Angeles.