Volume 3,Issue 7
Analysis of the Synchrony between the Scientific Revolution and Changes in Social Structure
The scientific revolution, as a core force driving the expansion of human cognitive boundaries, has always maintained a profound interactive relationship with changes in social structure. Their synchronous evolution constitutes a crucial thread in the development of human civilization. This paper first traces the historical progression of the synchronous development between scientific revolutions and social structural changes, revealing the correspondence between scientific breakthroughs and transformations in social forms across different historical stages. It then analyzes the intrinsic mechanisms underlying the synchronicity of scientific revolutions and social structural changes from multiple dimensions, elucidating the dynamic relationships between scientific breakthroughs and societal needs, the cycles of scientific development and social transformation, as well as scientific innovation and societal resources. Against the backdrop of the contemporary technological revolution, this study proposes practical pathways to strengthen demand-oriented scientific research planning, improve institutional adaptation support systems, and promote public participation and collaborative mechanisms. These suggestions aim to provide theoretical reference and practical guidance for achieving efficient synchronization and adaptation between technological revolutions and social structures.
[1]Zhao M, Li H, 2024, The Evolution of Technological Science and an Examination of Human Subjectivity. Journal of Liaoning University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 52(6): 92–99.
[2] Li X, 2023, The Openness of the Modernization Process from the Perspective of World Historical Thought. Scientific Socialism, (5): 98–104.
[3] Xu H, 2023, The Dynamic Mechanism of Modernization and Historical Verification of Its Initial Formation. Journal of Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications: Social Sciences Edition, 25(1): 1–8.
[4] Xu X D, Chen L, 2021, The Transformation of the Modern "Empirical–Transcendental" Concept and the Scientific Revolution. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, (008): 037.
[5] Zhang J J, Lu N, 2024, Third Discussion on the Fourth Revolution in Anthropology: Research on the "Traditional–Modern" Transformation of Time-Honored Enterprises in the Internet Society from the Perspective of Enterprise Anthropology. Qinghai Journal of Ethnology, 35(2): 99–107.
[6] Shi Y, 2024, Technologically Driven Social Transformation and the Development of Sociology with Chinese Characteristics. The Journal of Humanities, (5): 101.
[7] Zhang C, 2019, Technology, Society, and the Reconstruction of Modernity in the Evolution of Civilization. Frontiers, (14): 51–57.
[8] Hao L, 2021, The Structured Process of Scientific Revolution. China Social Science Digest, 000(008): 45–46.
[9] Ma X, Ying X, 2022, Structure, Action, and History: The Origin and Development of Revolutionary Research from a Sociological Perspective. Social Sciences Digest, (9): 97–99.
[10] Li Z, 2023, Analysis of Social Structure Adjustment and Transformation in the Process of Chinese-Style Modernization. Journal of Hubei University of Economics: Humanities and Social Sciences Edition, 20(10): 4–10.
[11] Hu Q, Wang J, 2024, On Ideological Risks and Governance Under Disruptive Technology. Journal of China Emergency Management Science, (11): 198.
[12] Xiang X, Wan L, Cao J, 2021, The Governance Logic of the Scientific and Technological Revolution and the Path to Improving the Socialist Market Economy System. South China Economy, (09): 1–10.
[13] Zhou G P, Zou X H, 2022, Exploration of Achieving Common Prosperity Under the Background of the "New Industrial Revolution". Journal of Shijiazhuang Tiedao University: Social Sciences Edition, 16(4): 57–63.
[14] Tang X Y, 2022, The Impact of the Modern Scientific and Technological Revolution on Tourism Consumption. Tourism Tribune, (10): 002.
[15] Du M, 2024, The Evolution of the Structure of Scientific Revolution from the Perspective of Dialectics of Nature. Popular Art and Literature, (3): 187.