Volume 10,Issue 3
Comparative Study of Immobilization vs. Non-Immobilization in the Treatment of Anterior Talofibular Ligament Injuries
The anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) is the most frequently injured ligament in ankle sprains, yet optimal management strategies remain debated. This research seeks to synthesize the current knowledge surrounding ATFL injury treatments by comparing two common approaches: immobilization and functional non-immobilization care. Specifically, this research seeks to determine the necessity of restricting activity after an ATFL injury. Immobilization, especially of the ankles and legs, can significantly affect the patients’ quality of life and increase the risk of secondary injuries due to limited movement. The long-term risk and benefits of both approaches are critically examined to offer insights into best practices in treatment and rehabilitation.
[1] Aiyer A, Murali S, Kadakia A, 2023, Advances in Diagnosis and Management of Lateral Ankle Instability: A Review of Current Literature. JAAOS: Global Research and Reviews, 7(12): 134–146.
[2] Chen R, Wang Q, Li M, et al., 2023, Progress in Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Injury to the Anterior Talofibular Ligament. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 11(15): 3395–3401.
[3] Cooke M, Marsh J, Clark M, et al., 2009, Treatment of Severe Ankle Sprain: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Three Types of Mechanical Ankle Support with Tubular Bandage: The CAST Trial. Health Technology Assessment, 13(13).
[4] Keene D, Williamson E, Bruce J, et al., 2014, Ankle Sprains: Recovery and Rehabilitation. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 44(9): 690–701.
[5] Karlsson J, Lundin O, Lind K, Styf J, 2007, Early Mobilization versus Immobilization after Ankle Ligament Stabilization. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 9(5): 299–303.
[6] Doherty C, Bleakley C, Delahunt E, et al., 2016, Treatment and Prevention of Acute and Recurrent Ankle Sprain: An Overview of Systematic Reviews with Meta-Analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 51(2): 113–125.
[7] Perera M, Su P, Holdsworth S, et al., 2025, Changes to Muscle and Fascia Tissue after Eighteen Days of Ankle Immobilization Post-Ankle Sprain Injury: An MRI Case Study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 26(1): 34.
[8] Ruiz-Sánchez F, Ruiz-Muñoz M, Martín-Martín J, et al., 2022, Management and Treatment of Ankle Sprain according to Clinical Practice Guidelines: A PRISMA Systematic Review. Medicine, 101(42): e31087.
[9] Wolfe M, Uhl T, Mattacola C, et al., 2001, Management of Ankle Sprains: Classification of Ankle Sprains Grade Signs and Symptoms. American Family Physician, 63(1): 93–105.
[10] Smith R, Reischl S, 1986, Treatment of Ankle Sprains in Young Athletes. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 14(6): 465–471.
[11] Vuurberg G, Hoorntje A, Wink L, et al., 2018, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Ankle Sprains: Update of an Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 52(15): 956–956.
[12] Vilchez-Cavazos F, Quiroga-Garza A, Acosta-Olivo C, et al., 2025, Functional Treatment versus Immobilization for the Management of Acute Ankle Sprains: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 44: 48–55.
[13] Wikstrom E, Hubbard-Turner T, McKeon P, 2013, Understanding and Treating Lateral Ankle Sprains and Their Consequences. Sports Medicine, 43(6): 385–393.