Volume 3,Issue 9
Risks of Artificial Intelligence Intervening in College Writing Training: From Weakened Expression Ability to Shrunken Academic Thinking
Against the backdrop of digitalization and intelligentization in higher education, generative intelligence has been widely applied in college students’ writing training, replacing their independent structure construction with preset frameworks and argumentation paths. This substitution causes problems like singular writing structures, blurred conceptual boundaries, and inertial argumentation, weakening students’ expression ability and shrinking their academic thinking. To mitigate these risks, colleges and universities should adopt systematic governance: strengthen original text input, enhance in-depth writing training, and establish intelligent tool use norms, so as to maintain the cognitive function of writing training and foster students’ in-depth and creative academic expression abilities.
[1] Hou K, Sun Y, 2025, Ecological Ethical Reflection and Risk Mitigation of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Sciences Edition), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.16493/j.cnki.42-1627/c.20251027.002
[2] Fang X, Jiang X, Wang Y, 2025, Four-Dimensional Examination of Integrating Science and Technology Ethics Education into College Ideological and Political Courses. Academic Exploration, 1–9.
[3] Li Y, Dai Y, 2025, Artificial Intelligence as a Method: Systematic Generation and Governance Reconstruction of the Integration of Educational Technology Talents. Journal of Higher Education Evaluation, 1–12.
[4] Wu Z, Sun Q, 2025, Research on the Internal Mechanism and Practical Strategies of Generative Artificial Intelligence Empowering College Ideological and Political Education. Heilongjiang Education (Theory and Practice), (11): 29–32.
[5] Liu B, Cen Y, 2025, “Metamorphosis” and “Distortion” of Global Higher Education Under the Digital Wave. Journal of Higher Education Management, (06): 27–36.
[6] Liu B, Huang Q, Zhang J, 2025, A Multi-Subject Collaborative Governance Framework and Practical Strategies for Ethical Risks of GenAI in Educational Applications. Modern Distance Education Research, (05): 48–58.
[7] Xu J, 2025, Teaching Dilemmas and Countermeasures of College Commercial Creative Writing in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Social Scientist, (03): 182–187.
[8] Yin B, Zhuang X, 2025, The Application of Generative AI in Academic Writing: Exploration of Research Integrity Regulation and Ethical Approaches. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, (07): 100–109.
[9] Wang J, 2025, Reconsidering the Relationship Between Education and Technology. Open Education Research, (05): 4–10.
[10] Wang C, Xie X, Li F, 2025, Generative Artificial Intelligence Empowering the Digital Transformation of Education: Theory, Current Situation and Countermeasures. Think Tank Theory and Practice, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.19318/j.cnki.issn.2096-1634.20250213.0007
[11] Sun F, Hu Z, 2025, Generative Logic of Teaching and Learning Driven by Intelligent Technology. Journal of Higher Education, (02): 74–81.
[12] Hu W, 2025, Artificial Intelligence Driving Educational Reform: Application Fields, Practical Challenges and Future Prospects. Journal of the Chinese Society of Education, (S1): 4–6.
[13] Liu M, Guo S, Zhang W, et al., 2025, How Can Generative Artificial Intelligence Promote the Cultivation of Higher-Order Thinking Abilities?——A Meta-Analysis Based on 68 Empirical Studies. Journal of Distance Education, (05): 55–66.
[14] Quan J, Gu J, Du Q, 2025, Training Objectives and Implementation Strategies of Vocational College Students’ Digital Literacy in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Continue Education Research, (12): 100–106.
[15] Nie J, Li X, 2025, Resisting “Intelligent Illusion”: AI Hallucinations and Risk Prevention Practices in Mainstream Media Content Production. Journalism and Writing, (11): 97–109.