ARTICLE

Volume 10,Issue 1

Fall 2025

Cite this article
19
Citations
50
Views

Frequency of Mycobacterium tuberculosis among  Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Strains Isolated  from Clinical Specimen

Hyunmi Cho1 Jong-Bae Kim2 Young Uh1*
Show Less
1 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
2 Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea
© 2020 by the Author(s). Licensee Whioce Publishing, USA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Abstract

Background: Rapid and accurate detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is of primary importance for infection control and selection of antituberculosis drugs. However, most clinical laboratories report Mtb complex  (MTC) without reporting Mtb because MTC comprising Mtb, Mycobacterium  bovis, Mycobacterium africanum, Mycobacterium microti, Mycobacterium  caprae, and Mycobacterium pinnipedii have 99.9% similarity at the nucleotide  level and identical 16S rRNA sequences. This study was conducted to analyze  the species frequency of MTC isolates obtained from clinical specimens. Methods: Of 310 MTC isolates obtained from clinical samples in a tertiary care  hospital from February 2017 to August 2018, MolecuTech Real TB-Taq (YD  Diagnostics, Korea) real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed,  specifically to detect Mtb. For DNA showing Mtb negative results by Mtbspecific real-time PCR or pyrazinamide-resistant strains, PCR-based MTC  typing, spacer oligonucleotide typing (spoligotyping), and exact tandem repeat  D gene sequencing were performed. Results: All the 310 MTC isolates were  identified to be Mtb. Two Mtb strains of the East-African-Indian 4-Vietnam  genotype, which have not been reported in Korea, were also found. Conclusion: There was no zoonotic tuberculosis in this study. Since we investigated only  310 MTC isolates detected in only one medical institution, a multi-center study  is needed to accurately know the prevalence of zoonotic tuberculosis in Korea.

Keywords
Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex
Sequence analysis
Spoligotyping
References

1. Rodriguez-Campos S, Smith NH, Boniotti MB, et al. Overview and Phylogeny of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Organisms: Implications for Diagnostics and Legislation of Bovine Tuberculosis. Res Vet Sci, 2014, 97: S5–S19.
2. Rastogi N, Legrand E, Sola C. The Mycobacteria: An Introduction to Nomenclature and Pathogenesis. Rev Sci Tech, 2001, 20: 21–54.
3. Hwang S, Oh KJ, Jang IH, et al. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of the AdvanSure TB/NTM Real-Time PCR Kit for Detection of Mycobacteria. Korean J Clin Microbiol, 2011, 14: 55–59.
4. Huard RC, Lazzarini LC, Butler WR, et al. PCR-Based Method to Differentiate the Subspecies of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex on the Basis of Genomic Deletions. J Clin Microbiol, 2003, 41: 1637–1650.
5. Djelouadji Z, Raoult D, Daffé M, et al. A Single-Step Sequencing Method for the Identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Species. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2008, 2: e253.
6. Coitinho C, Greif G, Robello C, et al. Identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex by Polymerase Chain Reaction of Exact Tandem Repeat-D Fragment from Mycobacterial Cultures. Int J Mycobacteriol, 2012, 1: 146–148.
7. Global Tuberculosis Report 2018. World Health Organization, 2018, Geneva.
8. Roadmap for Zoonotic Tuberculosis. World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, and World Organisation for Animal Health, 2017, Geneva.
9. Müller B, Dürr S, Alonso S, et al. Zoonotic Mycobacterium bovis-Induced Tuberculosis in Humans. Emerg Infect Dis, 2013, 19: 899–908.
10. Dürr S, Müller B, Alonso S, et al. Differences in Primary Sites of Infection between Zoonotic and Human Tuberculosis: Results from a Worldwide Systematic Review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2013, 7: e2399.
11. Lim SK, Park JY, Park SD, et al. Localized Empyema due to Mycobacterium bovis. Korean J Med, 2012, 81: 792–796.
12. Brown T, Nikolayevskyy V, Velji P, et al. Associations between Mycobacterium tuberculosis Strains and Phenotypes. Emerg Infect Dis, 2010, 16: 272–280.
13. Das S, Das SC, Verma R. Occurrence of RD9 Region and 500 bp Fragment Among Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis. Microbiol Immunol, 2007, 51: 231–234.
14. Kamerbeek J, Schouls L, Kolk A, et al. Simultaneous Detection and Strain Differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for Diagnosis and Epidemiology. J Clin Microbiol, 1997, 35: 907–914.
15. Azadi D, Motallebirad T, Ghaffari K, et al. Mycobacteriosis and Tuberculosis: Laboratory Diagnosis. Open Microbiol J, 2018, 12: 41–58.
16. Nguyen VA, Choisy M, Nguyen DH, et al. High Prevalence of Beijing and EAI4-VNM Genotypes Among M. tuberculosis Isolates in Northern Vietnam: Sampling Effect, Rural and Urban Disparities. PLoS One, 2012, 7: e45553.

Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Share
Back to top